home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: paladin.american.edu!solace!umdac!news
- From: sagge@ts.umu.se (Mattias Sandgren)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga,comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.sys.amiga.applications
- Subject: Re: Web browsers ?
- Date: 08 Mar 96 19:36:55 +0100
- Organization: University of Umea, Sweden
- Message-ID: <1155.6641T1176T2770@ts.umu.se>
- References: <1459.6639T705T2870@xmission.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: ipcs3-14.modem.umu.se
- X-Newsreader: THOR 2.22 (Amiga;TCP/IP) *UNREGISTERED*
-
-
- Previously some people wrote:
-
- >>> First, try using AMosaic 2.0 pre3 instead of 1.4b. Then upgrade to
- >>> MUI3.2 and you will have a browser that is tolerably fast and doesn't
- >>> crash anymore. (MUI was the culprit in previous versions that made
- >>> AMosaic cras a lot).
-
- >> Bullshit!
-
- >You are certainly entitled to your opinion but, AMosaic hasn't crashed here
- >since I started using MUI 3.3
-
- AMosaic has it's own custom window class to make it easier to
- display HTML-pages. The newer MUI versions (3+) are more tolerant
- to buggy classes (and stuff like that) and way faster.
-
- My personal opinion: MUI is great and contains few bugs, at least
- I haven't seen any on my system. MUI programs in general aren't
- buggier than others. AMosaic on the other hand is very buggy!
- People dislike MUI because it's one of a kind on the Amiga and uses
- up "too much" system resources. Buy a 540+ MB harddrive and at
- least an 8 MB SIMM and you won't have any problems with it.
- They're dirt cheap these days. The days when 512KB chip and
- floppies were awesome are over..
-
- (Why don't we create comp.sys.amiga.MUI.flame? ;-)
-
- --
- Mattias Sandgren (sagge@ts.umu.se)
-
-
-